May was the most active alliance in Capital Clash fight, so they retain NAP protection for the coming week. Excellent work May!
May was active in Leaders chat, and their strong military leaders (appointed officials) contributed a lot to our victory.
GrR was very active during the Capital Clash fight, they have also helped to gather intelligence about our enemies. Also the former president worked hard to make sure we get invasion right.
It was nice to see your Farm Alliance GF0 also also present on the fight.
DSy initially got me worried, in the end we had 35 people participating on the fight. Our alliance also worked on the strategy. Good job for the people who were present!
It was nice to see how even FSy had some representation in the fight.
Hope that the people who haven't made it (or haven't made it in time) can be more active next week.
Our friends from ROr were fighting alongside us in sufficient numbers and in good activity, well done ROr, you should stay under NAP protection this week.
Our friends from KoH also fought well, we seen KoH participating in the fight in sufficient numbers. They are remain under NAP protection.
Have seen AAA members participating, and while I haven't counted how many of you guys where there, other alliances were happy with the level of participation from AAA, so AAA should remain under NAP protecion.
33G, you are one of our closest allies and you are a very fierce alliance, surprisingly strong in both AD and in the Capital Clash, witnessed your activity so you should remain under NAP protection. Thank you for fighting hard, and thank you for growing even when you might face a disadvantage from your smaller cities. You fought very well, and deserve the recognition for it, and the NAP protecion.
Our friends in OK0, we were friends of each other since the begining, and I was happy to see your members lined up next to our lines in the fight. While I had no chance to count exactly how many members of OK0 were fighting alongside us, I am sure you fought well. And members of the leaders chat was also happy with the level of your participation, well done friends.
As OK0 wasn't active in Leaders chat,
I have witnessed your activity in a few areas, and as other alliances were happy with your level of activity you remain protected by NAP.
Smaller alliances
While we have seen some alliances present on 118, there were no smaller alliances participating with the activity to earn NAP Protection.
Alliance(s) losing NAP protection this week
- I have only seen very limited presence in the event from [IIT] Bombay.
- In Leaders chat the general oppinion mentioned lack of enough activity from [IIT] Bombay alliance.
- Reperesentatives of [IIT] Bombay was inactive in Leaders chat at the time of the fight, and they haven't contributed to tactical discussions before the fight.
- Leaders of [IIT] Bombay alliance had a chance to provide some proof (based on Alliance Duel data) that their members were fighting at least somewhere, but the leaders of [IIT] haven't responded to the requests.
Based on this information IIT Bombay have lost NAP protection for the coming week.. Sorry guys.
I remember how you lost NAP protection before, when you lost TOP 10 status, how you had to climb back to re-earn the NAP protection. Losing it again and getting hit again might hurt you badly, but we have to enforce tht participation requirement for NAP protecion.